Skip to content

Technology & systems

Systems that turn sourcing work into evidence

We are not a software company, and we do not claim a platform we have not built. What follows is how information is actually captured, sequenced and passed to buyers — with each item's status stated plainly.

Systems in use
3 of 6
Records produced
At every checkpoint
Specification
Versioned per mandate
Buyer portal
Planned, not live

Capability register

What exists today, and what does not

Each entry is marked in use, being established, or planned. Nothing on this page describes a capability that is only aspirational without saying so.

  • 01In use

    Specification control

    One written parameter set per mandate, versioned, and referenced by every check downstream.

    Every mandate runs from a single specification document rather than from an email thread. Inspection records, offers and shipment documents all reference the same version, so a disagreement about what was agreed resolves against a record instead of a recollection.

    Covers

    • Versioned specification per mandate
    • Tolerance bands and deviation consequences recorded alongside parameters
    • Referenced by inspection records and offers
    • Change history retained across a programme
  • 02In use

    Inspection recording

    Structured check records with photographs captured at the point of inspection, not written up afterwards.

    Checks produce a record at the time they happen: parameter readings, package counts, and photographs with container and seal numbers visible in frame. Contemporaneous records are the difference between a resolvable discussion and an unprovable assertion if a claim arises later.

    Covers

    • Per-parameter readings against the agreed specification
    • Photographic capture during loading with seals visible
    • Deviation flagged before loading rather than after
    • Records issued to the buyer as they are produced
  • 03In use

    Document sequencing

    Document lead times mapped backwards from the sailing date so conditional certificates exist when needed.

    Each document type has a lead time, and conditional documents requiring testing or treatment have the longest. Planning the sequence backwards from the sailing date is the single most effective way to avoid a shipment that is physically ready and documentarily incomplete.

    Covers

    • Applicable set determined during requirement qualification
    • Lead times mapped against the confirmed sailing date
    • Cross-check across invoice, packing list and bill of lading before release
    • Credit wording settled before the credit is issued
  • 04Being established

    Origin traceability

    Passing supplier-level origin evidence through to the buyer, with the limits of that evidence stated plainly.

    Where a supplier can evidence the origin of a lot, that evidence travels with the shipment records. Where they cannot, we say so rather than passing an unsubstantiated declaration upward as though it were verified. A structured framework for capturing this consistently is being established.

    Covers

    • Supplier-level origin evidence captured where available
    • Unverifiable claims passed on as the supplier's claim, not ours
    • Feedstock documentation requirements raised at enquiry stage
    • Consistent capture framework in development
  • 05Being established

    Programme trend reporting

    Results tracked across lots so a slow drift is visible before it becomes a rejection.

    Judging lots one at a time hides gradual movement. Consolidating results across a programme surfaces a drift in moisture or ash while there is still time to adjust the tolerance, the price or the loading window.

    Covers

    • Consolidated results across shipments in a programme
    • Trend visibility rather than lot-by-lot judgement
    • Seasonal risk raised in advance with options
    • Periodic specification review at agreed intervals
  • 06Planned

    Buyer shipment portal

    A single place for a buyer to see specification, inspection records and document status for their shipments.

    Records are currently issued directly to buyers as they are produced. A consolidated portal giving buyers self-service access to specification versions, inspection records and document status across their shipments is planned.

    Covers

    • Specification version history per mandate
    • Inspection records and photographs by shipment
    • Document status against the planned timeline
    • Programme-level trend reporting

Why it matters

A record is worth more than a recollection

If a claim arises after arrival, the question is always the same: what was agreed, and what was actually loaded. Answering it requires a versioned specification and contemporaneous records against it.

Photographs taken during loading with the container and seal numbers visible in frame are worth more than a report written afterwards. Everything on this page exists to make that kind of evidence routine rather than exceptional.